Iraq Junior? Georgia acts preemptively.

Georgia has attacked South Ossetia, on the opening day of the Olympics no less. Like Iraq, this conflict is about oil and American interests in seeking to secure oil for itself. Specifically, it’s about the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline . The US wants to create an alternative pipeline to the other pipeline which runs through Russian territory and ends in Novorossiysk (in Krasnodar Krai).

Shame on George Bush and Georgian President Saakshavili. Both men have blood on their hands.

The news that most of you will get from CNN, PBS, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, The Economist, et al will be only part of the story. Some of this anti-Russian bias is subjective (Where you stand depends on where you sit) and some the bias is due to the fact that very few Western journalists speak Russian or Georgian and know almost nothing about the recent history of South Ossetia, so the questions they ask are rudimentary and uninformed.

A few weeks ago the US held military training exercises with Georgia. Coincidence?

In 2007 alone,
Turkey armed Georgian MoD and the Borderguards as follows:
100 armoured personel carriers;
50 hand held missile complexes ANZA-2 of Pakistani origin;
5 Kylich 2 speed boats;
6 “Dogan” torpedo boats;
2 mine sweepers and 2 troop carrier vessels;
SKY WATCHER Air attack early warning system;
80 ??5 MTS A6 rifles;
1800 M-72 hand grenade launches;
2000 automatic rifle mounted grenade launches;
10 million 5,45 caliber ammo;
160 ??5?3 machine guns;
25,000 uniforms.
Bulgaria supplied:
250 missiles for “Factoria” missile complex;
50,000 122 caliber shells for D30 mortars
Czech Republic supplied:
10 L-159 “Alca” aircraft;
620 tonns of ammunition (primarily for Russian and Ukrainian made weapons);
Since 2004 Georgia received from (primarily East European) NATO member states and Ukraine 175 tanks, 126 armoured personnel carriers, 67 large caliber guns, 4 warplanes, 12 helicopter gunships and 8 military vessels. In September Georgia is scheduled to receive 4 Mirage 2000 fighters and 15 Black Hawk helicopters. In addition to that Turkey, France, Spain and the US have all signed agreements to supply Georgia with 10 more military vessels of different class.
Add to the above 48 Mi24 gunships left from the Soviet period, some 200 T72 tanks, 56 BTR2, 12 Mig21 (almost totally rebuilt by Israel) and you will have the largest airforce in the region.
This makes Georgian armed forces better equipped than any other ex Soviet army.
No surprise Saak is trigger happy…..

The US is using Georgia as a proxy army to create a conflict which it believes will enable it to create an alternative pipeline. This is a bad reason for war. January 2009 CAN’T come fast enough. Let’s hope Barack Obama has more sense than our idiot President Bush. As they say, hope is the last thing to die!! I’m still hoping.

Question, Why is South Ossetia different from Kosovo? It isn’t, the people there already declared their independence. Georgia doesn’t give a damn about South Ossetia but by creating a conflict there they are hoping it will speed-up the process of NATO membership. Most Georgians could care less about NATO membership but Saakshavili knows his Presidency is very weak and that Georgians don’t want him as President but he’s hoping that NATO membership will change Georgians minds.

There’s much more to this conflict than meets the uninformed eye. Stay tuned…..

Update: The Western press is reporting that Ms. Rice is calling for the Russians to stop their “attacks” on “Georgia.” Words matter! The “attacks” Madame Secretary are NOT on Georgia but rather in South Ossetia. Big difference. Don’t forget, Georgia started the military incident by sending its troops into South Ossetia without provocation (i.e. preemptively. The Bush Doctrine is now being applied by others). Georgia is killing civilians. Russia is responding to these aggressive actions.

Bottom-line: The situation was unstable in South Ossetia with many people holding many different opinions about what should happen. Up until Friday, all of disagreements were verbal. Everything changed when Saakshavili preemptively used his military to escalate the disagreement into an armed conflict.

  • flyovercountry
    Who is supplying who with what?

    Venezuela
    20 air-defense systems,
    50 attack helicopters
    12 military transport planes
    24 fighter jets
    IL-78 air refuellers and IL-76 transporters
    100,000 Kalashnikov rifles half a million rounds of ammunition, state-of-the-art night vision scopes and bayonets. and a factory to build and export more...

    Iran
    nuclear tech, reactors etc,
    anti aircraft systems
    endless list of equipment and supplies.

    I can only hope that these deals are just another way for putin and the other thugs to line their pockets with more state money, and wont actually happen.
  • flyovercountry
    Obama has called for direct talks among all sides and said the United States, the U.N. Security Council and other parties should try to help bring about a peaceful resolution. “I condemn Russia’s aggressive actions and reiterate my call for an immediate ceasefire,” Obama said in a statement. “Russia must stop its bombing campaign, cease flights of Russian aircraft in Georgian airspace, and withdraw its ground forces from Georgia.”‘
    Tim, your own messiah doesnt support your position.
  • McCain
    Timothy is correct. This is all about oil. Russia is trying to bring instability to a country that has circumvented Russia’s stranglehold on Central Asia’s oil and gas (Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline). The pipeline is already in place and pumping 1% of the world’s oil consumption. Turkey Azerbaijan and Georgia have announced a joint railway and are moving forward to increase pipeline capacity and an additional natural gas pipeline. Follow the money folks. Europe wants competition in oil and gas supplies due to Russia’s past actions and Russia wants it’s monopoly to continue.
  • "by creating a conflict there they are hoping it will speed-up the process of NATO membership."

    Actually, by "creating" the conflict, Georgia's chances of NATO accession are lessened, as not being currently involved in an unresolved conflict is a prerequisite for NATO membership. So, I'm not sure I follow your logic there.

    Remember, restoring Abkhazia and S. Ossetia to Georgia were (popular) planks of Saak's successful election campaigns.

    S. Ossetia is still internationally recognized (even by Russia, officially) as Georgian territory. Russia has never OFFICIALLY acknowledged its independence. And Lavrov has never said this is about protecting S. Ossetia's sovereignty, but rather Russian citizens and peacekeepers.

    So, how does attacking S. Ossetia (which Russia has never OFFICIALLY recognized as independent) have anything to do with the pipeline? Your logic above is unclear. The West can build as many pipelines through Georgia as they wish whether or not S. Ossetia is under Georgian/Russian control?

    Right now, you know S. Ossetia is sort of a no-man's land like Transnistria, a haven for organized crime and outside of the rule of law (by either Georgia or Russia). That instability weakens Georgia economically by warding off foreign investment, hinders their EU and NATO aspirations. What are they supposed to do about that?

    And if it was purely a "preemptive" strike by Georgia, why has Russia been mobilizing troops along the Khodori gorge and North Ossetia? Why did S. Ossetian troops (presumably) fire on Georgian villages after Saak got on TV and begged for a ceasefire on Friday?
  • blackseabrew
    We were warned 48 years ago about the military/industrial complex by Eisenhower. During a period of the Cold War when the average person might have thought more weapons would have been a good thing. But Dwight was a wise man and realized the political influence, I daresay propaganda, that could be wielded by the military/industrial complex can produce the situation we're seeing Georgia.

    Unfortunately the most ignorant and unwise president in the history of the United States, George W. Bush, is now sitting in office. You are correct. January, 2009, cannot come soon enough.
  • Thanks for covering this! Was reading English-lang news all day long and just got soo damn frustrated..
blog comments powered by Disqus